Ironman Mark

My right leg/foot is feeling a bit better.  It seems fine on the bike but every now and then I get a twinge when just doing normal stuff.  I did a 10 minute run on Friday and it felt fine.  This afternoon I’ll go out on my tri bike for a couple of hours just to remind myself how to ride it.

Tomorrow’s half-marathon is going to be interesting.  The plan is pretty much going to be to run near to the guy with the 1:30 flag and then have a go at pipping him to the line! To be honest, I am not confident that I will beat him!  But, if my leg holds up, I will get very close.

This time of year, I start enjoying the weather.  It’s light at just after 6am now and I have driven home in the light.  This morning it was sunny (albeit with a hard white frost) but that cleared up as soon as the sun got out.   This evening, I plan on going to see the moon rise.  By all accounts, it should look pretty huge.

Yes, I am.

But I like numbers so can I prove it?

I did IMUK in 2007 in 11 hours 44 minutes.  I did IM Lanzarote last weekend in 12 hours 8 minutes.  So that sounds like I am less fit.  So what would be my equivalent IM UK time?

If I look at the average times of Scott Neyedli and Stephen Bayliss in the two races (1^st and 2^nd in UK v 5^th and 6^thin Lanza) I get the following:

                Swim: 106.7% of UK time

                Bike: 104.9% of UK time

                Run: 103.2% of UK time

                Overall: 105.1% of UK time

If I also deduct 30 minutes for the wheel problem at Lanza and adjust for the % difference then I get:

Swim: 55:24 v 57:42 – a 1:48 or 3.1% improvement

Bike: 6:10:38 v 6:23:57 – a 13:39 or 3.5% improvement

Run: 3:48:51 v 4:13:05 – a 24:14 or 9.6% improvement

Overall: 11:04:10 v 11:44:27 – a 40:17 or 5.7% improvement

So, I am 5.7% quicker!

By way of comparison, my Reading Half-Marathon times have reduced by: 3.5% (2007), 6.1% (2008) and 4.8% (2009).  The reduction between 2007 and 2009 is 10.6% so a 9.6% difference on the run is not silly.

This then begs the question of how much quicker I could go.  If I could improve another 5% the next time I do Lanza, that would mean:

                Swim: 0:57

                Bike: 6:09

                Run: 3:44

                Overall:  11:03

In reality, a 5% improvement on the swim would be difficult.  But a 5% improvement on the bike and run has got to be do-able.  A 5.5% improvement would get me below 11 hours.

Qualifying for Hawaii is not an issue.  The last slot went at 10:19:26.  I would have to improve by 11.3% to do this.  11.3% is a small number in some contexts.  However, in improving my overall triathlon, it is a very, very large number!!

Do you think I like numbers too much?